“Black Eyes and Boobs”

October 11, 2008

Here’s another post from my blog for my sexual assault class. I feel much can be developed here, and I’d certainly like to develop the arguments here more at some point. The title, sadly, isn’t my creation, hence the quotations marks.

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM). It’s also Domestic Violence Awareness Month (DVAM), though you wouldn’t know it after being swarmed with pink products and consumerism supposedly aimed at finding a cure for cancer.

So what’s the deal?

Breast cancer and domestic violence (which, as a category, sexual assault falls under) are both huge problems, but surely something’s amiss when grocery stores are decked out in pink and people are doling out money for donations Jingle Jugs, while DVAM barely gets a nod.

For starters, let’s consider that breast cancer has higher incidence rates in White women. Despite this, Black women have a 37 percent higher chance of death as a result of breast cancer.

Now, taking a look at domestic violence, 8 out of 10 Aboriginal women experience violence in their relationships, out of which 87% were physically injured and 57% were sexually abused, according to a study conducted in Ontario.

I know this argument is slightly problematic. Black women aren’t Aboriginal, and an American study isn’t a Canadian study. Nevertheless, I don’t feel issues of race can be ignored when it comes to addressing this problem.

With that said, even with the large number of White women affected directly by breast cancer, a larger number of White women are affected by domestic violence. (50 percent of women over the age of 18 experience some form of violence according to the 1993 VAW survey - you do the math.)

To say that DVAM gets barely any acknowledgment solely due to race would be a great simplification, but it can’t be ignored, either. Yes, other factors are at play, such as an unwillingness to openly discuss VAW and the fact that the organisations mobilising around cancer have a lot more funding. Nevertheless, ignoring race when it comes to VAW is an oversight, to say the least.

What’s the solution? We need to tackle the hesitancies people feel when dicussing domestic violence and sexual assault, in my mind. Not only that, but we need to remember about all of our sisters, and that White women aren’t the only women that matter in the world. How we go about doing that is a whole other discussion.


When Walking Women Home is Problematic

June 22, 2008

I vlogged about the recent rapes that have been happening in my neighbourhood lately and covered victim blaming too, but I feel that doesn’t even begin to address the many discourses surrounding rape. So, when I was walking home last night past 2:00 with some friends (let’s call them Steve, Susan, and Erin), we came to the time for us to return to our homes. Susan and I lived closest, and Steve not much further. I said to Erin that I would go home to get my bike while she walked to Susan’s house, and then I would walk her home. I then asked Steve if he needed someone to walk home with him, to which he said he’d be fine. So, the women and men split up and I walked with Steve as far as my apartment, and then we went our separate ways. I grabbed my bike and met Erin some blocks away. It was here when she asked me, “Why does Steve get the option of being walked home when I don’t?” And rightly so.

There are a number of problems with this scenario, and I’m not sure I know any solutions, but allow me to at least lay out the problems as clearly as possible (and call me out on any I miss). Before, though, perhaps some things should be made clear, to put matters in context. First, there have been sexual assaults in the area I live in. Even if that weren’t the case, though, women are still sexually assaulted at a frighteningly high rate, with some studies stating 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. The 1993 Violence Against Women Survey showed that half of all women in Canada will be physically or sexually assaulted. Women are victims of sexual assault far more often than men. That’s some of the context. Now, on to the problems.

First, something that didn’t occur to me until later, is that my actions reinforce the stereotype that women are assaulted by strangers while walking alone at night. This isn’t the case in the majority of situations. Some studies cite that 69 percent of women are sexually assaulted by men they know. Statistically, I pose more of a threat to friends that I walk home than a stranger jumping out from an alley or a bush, and that’s something I’ve failed to take into consideration when in situations such as the one described above.

Second, my behaviour reinforces the idea that women need to be protected by men. While this certainly wasn’t the logic behind my actions, my friend pointed out (and I completely agree) that it appears that way to others. The fact is, I’m male, and even if I want to walk a friend (who happens to be a woman) home because I think people are safer when they’re with others, and even if I want to walk her home as a friend, not a male friend, this isn’t the way it appears to others. To most other people (and certainly people who don’t know me), I’m just another guy walking a woman home to protect her from the crazies just waiting to assault a woman walking home. The fact that I didn’t walk Steve home further exemplifies this.

Third, and perhaps the most troublesome, is the element of choice that my friend brought up. She’s right: I essentially told her I’d be walking her home, while I asked Steve. Not only that, but if she had refused, I would have insisted kindly. When Steve refused, I gave him an “Are you sure?” and that was that. If Erin absolutely refused to be walked home, I would have relented, but likely only then. And that’s not okay. While I might think at the time a refusal is simply an unwillingness to be a burden to another person, that’s not necessarily the case. A “no,” in whatever form, needs to be adhered to.

With past experiences, I’ve been placed in situations where I’ll be leaving a venue with a woman I met that day or night, and I’ll often ask to walk her home or to her car. In situations where I’ve received a “no,” I’ve complied immediately. With good friends, and probably with acquaintances, I’ve likely always insisted at least once. Why should it be different? In my mind, this is probably once again due to the stereotype that women are assaulted by strangers, something I’m aware of, but haven’t been when placed in these situations. Feminism is about choice for women, though, and if I’m depriving anyone of choice, that, in my mind, isn’t okay.

Another issue comes up, though. If I chose to simply go home and not walk a friend home and something did happen, I would feel guilty, not as a man who’s duty it was to protect his friend, but as a friend who should have been there for another friend. The same holds for both female and male friends: If something had happened to Steve on his way home, I would have felt incredibly guilty for not going to his home with him, yet I didn’t insist that I walk him home after his initial “no.” What is the solution? I don’t think it should be denied that sometimes people simply don’t want to burden another person, be they acquaintance or good friend. Should a “no” that results from those feelings be given the same weight as a more direct “no?” The trouble is, we can only determine so much by tone of voice, so the answer is probably “yes.” That might not rid a compliant friend of the guilt resulting from a friend’s assault (if it ever happened), but the answer to that is, in my mind, that we probably need to respect other people’s autonomy more than we do. Furthermore, if I respect a male friend’s autonomous choice to walk himself home but deny a female friend the same choice, never mind statistics or uneasy feelings: that’s sexist.

I’ll have moments like this in the future, I’m sure of it. Despite my best intents to rid myself of sexism, it still lurks beneath my privilege, and this won’t be the last time I discover I still harbour some sexism. All I can hope for is that when I write posts like this they get people thinking so we can move beyond the problems.


Vlogging Feminism: The Garneau Rapist and Victim Blaming

June 14, 2008

Synopsis: There have been a number of rapes in the Garneau area (where I live) and I thought this was a good time to tell people about victim blaming and the importance of not falling into that trap. Men are the perpetrators and, as such, they should be held responsible. Men need to be active in stopping rape; it’s not enough to merely refrain from the act.


Harry Ainlay Hates Vaginas

May 8, 2008

I’m a bit behind the ball on this one, but a local Edmonton high school, Harry Ainlay, took action against a production of the Vagina Monologues that student Bonnie Ings was directing. I spoke with Bonnie and she gave me some insight into what happened.

Apparently, the assistant principals of the school decided not to let the play go on, as the principal, “Mrs. Smith,” was away. Despite the concerns of the staff, it was Smith who eventually decided to let the play go on that evening, on the condition that only those who were 18 or older could see it unless permission was granted by a parent.

Bonnie writes,

It is my belief that the cancellation of the play was directly related to the title and a lack of understanding of the play’s message of female empowerment. The issues in the Vagina Monolgues of rape, physical abuse, genital mutiliation and orgasmic pleasure scared the administration. There were other plays in Harry Ainlay’s One Act festival that dealt with mature subjects such as incest, rape, and murder which in my belief are at least on par with the issues in the Vagina Monologues.

The backlash against the Vagina Monologues is nothing new, of course, and I could come up with possible reasons for some time. A misunderstanding could certainly be the culprit, although that might be giving those responsible for the cancellation too much credit. Anyone who wants to understand the play can take a brief moment to look into it and find out. What I find is likely is that those opposed to the play (and there are many) may be directly opposed to the messages within the play. What? Women have their own sexuality as well? We should address issues like violence against women and rape rather than remaining silent? Unfathomable, I know.

Anyway, I want to say props to Bonnie for putting on the play in the first place. I don’t think it’s inappropriate for a high school audience at all, but I don’t know anyone I went to high school with who considered directing it, or who even really knew what it was.


Contending with the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, Bill C-484, and Violence Against Pregnant Women

April 14, 2008

This past Friday, I attended a lecture by Dr. Rebecca Stringer, a professor from the University of Otago in New Zealand, who presented, “Fact, Fiction, and the Foetus: Violence Against Pregnant Women and the Politics of Abortion.” It was, primarily, an academic approach to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (UVVA) in America.

America previously used the “born alive” rule when dealing with harm inflicted on the foetus, which held that matters such as homicide or assault only applied to children outside the womb, so that a foetus in utero, if harmed, would result in no charge against the person who had harmed it. UVVA overturned this.

Smash Patriarchy!


Are you an MRA? Introducing an Exciting New Guide to Help you Answer the All-Important Question!

April 11, 2008

Oh, Men’s Rights Activists: Where would we be without you? Well, on numerous occasions, my blog stats would have been a lot lower (and they’ll probably be much higher after I post this). I’m afraid the benefits - for me, at least - don’t extend beyond that. MRAs are, ultimately, harmful to many goals for equality, and, perhaps worse, are harmful to their own cause: No one wants to grant more “freedoms” (I hear that’s what they call them) to assholes. Of course, I don’t want to discount the good intentions of many men who are combating injustices committed against them, such as violence against men, or, at times the unfair treatment they receive in court systems, especially regarding custody battles - these are, I feel, legitimate concerns when dealt with properly (i.e. by not distorting statistics). To avoid confusion, these men may be referred to as feminists, or pro-feminists, or, to ensure maximum comfort, feminist-friendly men. These men are not assholes. MRAs are assholes. So, to avoid being a terribly misguided, misogynist, MRA douchebag, here’s an easy guide to help you find out if you already are one:

Smash Patriarchy!


Biting Beaver’s Rapist Checklist

March 22, 2008

As I am still busy with life matters and so on, here is something all of you should read if you haven’t already. Made by Biting Beaver, this is her Rapist Checklist.

The Rapist Checklist

Some things to remember…

1. You are a rapist if you get a girl drunk and have sex with her.

2. You are a rapist if you find a drunk girl and have sex with her.

3. You are a rapist if you get yourself drunk too and have sex with her. Your drunkeness is no excuse.

4. If you are BOTH drunk you may still be a rapist.

5. If she’s alternating between puking her guts out and passing out in the bed then you’re a rapist.

6. If she’s sleeping and you have sex with her you’re a rapist.

7. If she’s unconscious and you have sex with her then you’re a rapist.

8. If she’s taking sleeping pills and doesn’t wake up when you have sex with her then you’re a rapist.

9. If she is incapacitated in any way and unable to say ‘Yes’ then you’re a rapist.

10. If you drug her then you’re a rapist.

11. If you find a drugged girl and have sex with her then you’re a rapist.

12. If you don’t bother to ask her permission and she says neither ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ then you could be a rapist.

13. You are a rapist if you ‘nag’ her for sex. Because you manage to ply an eventual ‘yes’ from a weary victim doesn’t mean it’s not rape. You are a rapist.

14. You are a rapist if you try to circumvent her “No” by talking her into it. She’s not playing hard to get, and, even if she IS it’s not YOUR responsibility to ‘get’ her. You’re still a rapist.

15. You are a rapist if you manipulate her into sex when she doesn’t otherwise want it. If you say, “If you loved me you’d do X” then you’re a rapist. If you say, “All the other kids are doing it!” then you’re a rapist.

16. If you threaten her, or act in a way that SHE thinks you’re threatening her then you’re a rapist. If you puff up and get loud and frustrated while trying to ‘talk’ her into sex then you’re a rapist.

17. You are a rapist if you don’t immediately get your hands off of her when she says ‘no’. You are a rapist if you take your hands off of her and then put them back ON her after 10 minutes and she eventually ‘gives in’ to this tactic.

18. You are a rapist if you won’t let her sleep peacefully without waking her every 15 minutes asking her for sex. Sleep depravation is a form of torture and YOU are a rapist.

19. If you’re necking with her and you’re naked and you’ve already gone down on her and she says ‘No’ to sex with you and you have sex with her anyway then you’re a rapist.

20. If you’re engaged in intercourse and she says ‘No’ at ANY point and you don’t immediately stop then you’re a rapist.

21. If she said “Yes” to sex with a condom and that condom breaks and you proceed anyway then you’re a rapist.

22. If she picked you up at a bar looking for sex and then decides that she doesn’t WANT sex and you continue then you’re a rapist.

23. If she changes her mind at ANY point for ANY reason and you don’t immediately back off or you try to talk her into it and get sex anyway then you’re a rapist.

24. If you don’t hit her and she says ‘No’ you’re still a rapist.

25. If you don’t have a knife or a gun or a garrote and she says ‘No’ then you’re still a rapist.

26. If you’re a friend of hers you can still be a rapist.

27. If you had sex with her the night before but she doesn’t want morning sex and you pressure her for it anyway then you’re a rapist.

28. If you’re her husband you can still be a rapist.

29. If it’s your wedding night and she doesn’t WANT to have sex with you and you force or coerce her anyway then you’re a rapist.

30. If she’s had sex with you hundreds of times before but doesn’t want to on the 101st time then you’re a rapist.

31. If you penetrate her anally, orally or digitally against her will then YOU my friend, are ALSO a rapist.

32. Women do not owe you sex.

33. Buying her dinner does not entitle you to sex.

34. Paying her mortgage does not entitle you to sex.

35. Buying her clothing does not entitle you to sex.

36. Buying her lingerie does not entitle you to sex. It also doesn’t mean that she has any obligation to wear that lingerie around you.

37. Spending any amount of money on her does not, ever, entitle you to sex.

38. Seeing her legs or cleavage does not entitle you to sex.

39. If she ‘turns you on’ you’re not entitled to sex.

40. If she has ****ed every man in a 10 square mile radius and she doesn’t want to **** you and you have sex with her anyway, then you’re a rapist.

41. Her clothing is not a reason for you to rape her. Her LACK of clothing is no reason to rape her. If she’s wearing a thong and pasties you STILL have no right to rape her.

42. If she’s a prostitute and she says “No” then you’re a rapist.

43. If she’s a stripper and she says “No” then you’re a rapist. Likewise, if she’s a stripper and she’s been rubbing against your &!#@ all night long and you follow her to her car and have sex with her against her will then you are ALSO a rapist.

44. If you watch a woman being raped without calling the authorities then you’re as bad as a rapist and you may also be a rapist yourself.

45. If you don’t fight rape then you accept rape.

46. If you don’t believe a woman when she says she was raped then you’re encouraging rape.

47. If you choose to remain friends with a man who raped a woman you are encouraging rape.

48. If you confess to the authorities that you raped a woman it does not exonerate you. You are not suddenly a model of good behavior.

49. If you ‘only’ raped one woman, you’re STILL a rapist.

50. You cannot tell who is a rapist by the way they look. Rapists are your friends, your brothers, your fathers and you won’t know it.

51. Do not get frustrated with a woman if she doesn’t trust you. SHE already knows that rapists don’t wear signs on their foreheads. Something you think is innocuous SHE may find terrifying.


I Smell Victim Blaming

December 13, 2007

With all the horrible stories on rape, why not keep going? It’s a terrible world for rape victims we live in and stories like this highlight the fact. So, in light of that, a judge in Calgary has called a rape survivor “stupid” for getting into a car with rapist Stefano Priolo. To top it off, here in lovely Canada we have an absolutely fantastic rate of rape reportage: a stunning 8%.

I wish victim blaming was something new and hasn’t been going on for ages. I really wish rapists weren’t given a mere few years in jail and were directly blamed for their actions. Instead, survivors go through humiliating cross-examinations once they gather the courage to actually report it. To the rapists, the judges, the MRAs, the misogynists, and all the other asshats: it doesn’t matter what a woman wore, how she acted, how drunk she was, if she said nothing, what her sexual history is, and it doesn’t matter what she does for a living. These matters are not relevant in determining if a women was raped or not, and if you use any of these to excuse your actions, you’re probably a rapist, and fuck you.

On that note, read the “Was He Asking for It?” piece. The rest of that site is great, too, though.

Via Feministing.


Some Reassuring News

December 11, 2007

The rape case ruling I linked to yesterday is being appealed. I’ll do my best to keep up to date on this story, but if anyone comes across news that I miss, please leave a link in the comments!

Edit: Courtesy Elaine, please contact the judge.

Judges Chambers
District Court
PO Box 7515
Cairns Q 4870
AUSTRALIA

Telephone : 07 4039 8909
Facsimile : 07 4039 8006
E-mail: associate.bradleyjdc@courts.qld.gov.au


Can This Day Get Any Worse?

December 10, 2007

A judge has recently decided not to send nine men to jail for raping a 10-year-old girl. Her reason? She states that the girl probably agreed to have sex with all of the men. Luckily, it seems many officials are outraged by this as I am and they’re not going to settle with this result. Let’s hope this results in good news. But still, it infuriates me when survivors have to go through humiliation like this. Funny thing that girls and women aren’t interested in sex until they get raped.

Does anyone have some good news?