(Mis)Conceptions

November 12, 2008

There’s a great project that’s come out of the University of Alberta Women’s Centre, at the hands of a great person (I won’t name her out of respect for anonymity), called (Mis)Conceptions: Expressing Reproductive Rights.

It’s a lot like PostSecret, in that she’s asking people to send in postcards with pro-choice messages on them. Here are a couple of them:

misconceptions1

misconceptions2

If you’d like to submit your own postcards, it’s definitely encouraged, and they’ll be posted here. Just send them to:

Box 37
Students’ Union Building
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB
T6G 2J7

Please pass along the word, and check out the other postcards as they get posted here.


Report Back on the Life Chain

October 15, 2008

As many of you know, I helped organise an action against the Life Chain. I’m sorry I haven’t reported back on it yet, but I’m juggling a huge number of tasks right now.

Anyway, the action went extremely well. We put it together in about half a week, and there were between 15-20 people who showed up. (Another group showed up five minutes late and unfortunately we didn’t meet up with them.) A few of us made signs Saturday, the day before, and some people brought their own on Sunday.

We weren’t met with much hostility, as we kept to ourselves. (My advice is, if you want to do something like this, it might be best to keep to yourselves, too.) It was interesting to me that, while there were many women as well as men, the men were the only ones who acted aggressively. There was a man about my age who put an anti-choice sign in the window of his car and kept driving by, honking at us. Another, older man kept taking photos of us and engaged us, but was quickly pulled away by one of the other women. (If you’re reading this, please email the photos to me!)

All in all, it was an important action, but it was also the most fun I’d had in a while. Not much compares to the feeling I got when people drove past, honking their horns in approval, cheering out their windows, or giving a simple thumbs-up.

Before I finish this with some photos, I’d like to thank Denise, who was a huge help in helping to get this action going.

With that said, here are a couple of photos! (The only ones I have - sorry!)

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Some signs on my living-room floor.

Some signs on my living-room floor


Release for Stand Up Against the Pro-Life Chain

October 2, 2008

Hey everyone, if you could distribute this widely, that would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!

Stand Up Against the Pro-Life Chain

This Sunday, October 5th, Edmonton Pro-Life is displaying the annual Life Chain, where Pro-Life citizens will spread themselves across several city blocks with signs. The Life Chain will run from 2:30 until 3:30, beginning at the intersection of 104th Ave and 109th St. (near Grant MacEwan college) and will run west along 109th St. to 124th St. and then north to the Morgentaler Clinic at 109 A Ave.

It’s very important that a pro-choice voice be present at this demonstration. If you’d like to participate, we’ll be meeting at north of Churchill Square, by the woman-made pond (102 A Ave and 99 St.) at 2:00 and we’ll walk to where the Life Chain starts.

You’re encouraged to bring your own signs, (there probably won’t be enough for everyone) but please keep in mind this is to be a respectful demonstration. We will not be engaging with the Pro-Lifers in any way, verbally or otherwise. Please bring a positive attitude and positive pro-choice messages. Those who are disrespectful will be asked to leave. Remember, we’re representing the pro-choice movement with this action. Hope to see you there!

What: A demonstration against the Life Chain
Where: Meet by the entrance to Churchill Station (102 A Ave and 99 St.)
When: Sunday, October 5th, at 2:00
Why: To maintain a pro-choice voice in the Edmonton community

For more information, contact Derek Warwick at warwick.derek@gmail.com


Stand Against the Life Chain This Sunday

October 1, 2008

This Sunday, Oct. 5, Edmonton Prolife (I’m not linking them; you can Google their name if you like) is putting on a Life Chain. According to their website, the Life Chain

will run from 2:30 pm to 3:30 pm beginning at the intersection of 104th Ave and 109th St. (near the downtown campus of Grant MacEwan College) and will run west along 109th St. to 124th Street and then north on 124th St. to the Morgentaler Clinic at 109A Ave.

If you’re in the Edmonton area, or willing to commute here, it would be great if you could show up. It will just take an hour of your time. One person described what we should do quite well:

“As we know, anti-choice arguments are purely emotional and emotional arguments do not make sense and cannot be argued with in any constructive way. I think the most effective and responsible thing for us to do as a large pro-choice group is to form our own “life line” with lots of pro-choice messages that simply reflect our belief in a woman’s right to choice. Period. No shouting, no profanity, and no engagement with anti-choice emotional fanatacism.

Remember, we are winning the battle–even Steven Harper isn’t willing to reopen the debate!”

If you’re interested in attending or helping out, please email me at warwick[dot]derek[at]gmail[dot]com.

There will be a sign-making party of some sort this week (probably Friday or Saturday). The sign-making party venue is undecided, and if it’s a residence (like maybe my apartment!), it won’t be announced publicly. So, it’s really important that if you want to help make signs, you email me. (Or contact me through Facebook. Whatever works.) Also, please bring any supplies you can. I can’t afford all the stuff on my own, so bring paint, markers, poster board, etc., keeping in mind we can’t make a mess.

I hope to see some of you this week!

Note: There is also a Facebook event.


Women lack access to abortions in Canada

September 16, 2008
Courtesy section15.ca

Courtesy section15.ca

Sarah Ghabrial has an article at section15.ca on the limitations imposed on women when it comes to seeking an abortion:

These barriers may be geographic, economic, social, or any combination of the three. They severely restrict the reproductive choices of thousands of women every year. From one region to the next, funding and availability can be tenuous or non-existent. The Canada Health Act requires that reproductive health services be universal, reciprocal, safe, legal, and covered by Medicare. While abortions in hospitals are funded by the federal government, abortion clinics are under provincial jurisdiction, to be funded on pain of penalties. Still, some provinces choose not to, and often face little intervention from the federal level.

Read Part one of choice in Canada: Access to abortions


A lot can happen in a week…

August 31, 2008

Of all the weeks I could have been isolated from (most of) the world, of course it had to be last week. The week where the Tories dropped Bill C-484, Kyle Payne was sentenced to six months in jail, and McCain selected his running mate, Sarah Palin. To do all of these issues the minimal coverage they deserve, I’d be sitting at my computer for the rest of the day. So, I’d like to focus on the positive and local story, the fact that the Tories have dropped the Unborn Victims of Crime Act (for now).

When I got the text message telling me the bill was being dropped, I felt a sense of relief and excitement. Not only were women’s reproductive rights a little more safe in Canada for the time being, but I could stop stressing about planning a rally for September 28th against the bill and focus on other pressing concerns. After the initial elatedness settled, naturally I started thinking about the decision.

It should be no surprise that this announcement came once one considers the recent events that have transpired. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is threatening the other parties with an election, and it was just over a week ago that Liberal leader Stephane Dion urged Harper to clarify his stance on abortion.

Personally, I don’t think the bill had any chance of being adopted in the first place, but it was still dangerous in that it gave anti-choicers another platform to bring up their views. Nevertheless, the bill is far from dead. (In case you missed it amongst the abundance of links above, BigCityLib has a list of the MPs who continue to support it.) If Harper gets a majority, don’t be surprised if the bill comes back, despite announcements that the Tories are moving to introduce a bill that resembles Bill C-543 and would give tougher sentences to perpetrators of violence against pregnant women.

Wrapping this up, I feel this is a victory for feminists, pro-choice activists, and, most importantly, women. A small victory, perhaps, but a victory nevertheless. Let’s kill this bill off for good, though. Feminists across Canada need to demonstrate to the general public that Harper is bad for women and we absolutely cannot let him win this election. Feminists in Edmonton and Sherwood Park need to organise a campaign against Edmonton-Sherwood Park MP Ken Epp, as well, effectively demonstrating that women don’t want him or his bill. It’s crucial to keep in mind that the fight isn’t over, but I also feel it’s important to celebrate this small victory. So, feminists and allies, let’s get Harper out of Sussex Drive, but have some fun while we’re at it!


A Toast to Morgentaler and Women’s Reproductive Rights

July 2, 2008

As many of you have likely heard by now, Dr. Henry Morgentaler has been appointed the Order of Canada, which is pretty great news. For those of you who don’t know, Dr. Morgentaler played a huge part in the legalisation of abortion in Canada.

Needless to say, right-wingers are criticising the decision and the Conservative government is distancing itself from the news. A (not so) big surprise from Ken Epp, too, the MP who proposed Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime Bill:

Edmonton Tory MP Ken Epp, who has a private member’s bill before the House of Commons that would allow criminal charges to laid if a fetus dies or is injured in an attack on a pregnant woman, said Morgentaler’s supporters have gone too far.

But hey, I don’t want to focus too much on what the crazies are saying. This is a time to celebrate, and is indeed a step forward for the acknowledgment that women do, in fact, have rights.


Contending with the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, Bill C-484, and Violence Against Pregnant Women

April 14, 2008

This past Friday, I attended a lecture by Dr. Rebecca Stringer, a professor from the University of Otago in New Zealand, who presented, “Fact, Fiction, and the Foetus: Violence Against Pregnant Women and the Politics of Abortion.” It was, primarily, an academic approach to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (UVVA) in America.

America previously used the “born alive” rule when dealing with harm inflicted on the foetus, which held that matters such as homicide or assault only applied to children outside the womb, so that a foetus in utero, if harmed, would result in no charge against the person who had harmed it. UVVA overturned this.

Smash Patriarchy!


Pregnancy Crisis Centres in Edmonton

February 22, 2008

I don’t take public transit often, but yesterday I rode the LRT and an ad caught my attention. Near the ceiling and across the aisle was an ad for a pregnancy crisis centre. Wondering what sort of advice they gave, I made a note in my daily planner to look into their service. Upon performing a quick search of the Internet, I came across this. It’s slightly dated (May 2006), but relevant nonetheless. It’s quite scary when one looks into the “options” available to pregnant women.