Gender and Race at the U of A IDEAfest

March 8, 2009

Yesterday was the pilot project for the University of Alberta IDEAfest, an event for those in the Edmonton community to present their ideas to attendees. Presenters were given half-hour slots for their presentation and questions, and at any given time there were three presentations happening, each in a different lecture theatre, allowing attendees to choose the sessions that interested them most.

The sessions were varied, from Ian Bushfield’s “Atheism, Alberta and the 21st Century,” to Ross Lockwood’s “Zymurgy and the Physics of Beer.” In some sessions I learned a lot, in others, I was watching the clock tick the seconds away. All that being said, though, it was a decent pilot project, and some problems could have been fixed with more time to plan (it was all coordinated in two weeks, I believe), and better promotion.

Other problems, however, require a bit more attention. For example, the fact that most of the participants (presenters and attendees) were white.

Yes, there were some People of Colour at the sessions, but we were very clearly outnumbered by white people. Everywhere. And yes, I realise this is Alberta, but it’s also Edmonton, at the University of Alberta, both of which are hardly impenetrable bastions of white supremacy. Despite this, though, we (for the most part) had white audience members listen to white speakers, who at times spoke about issues facing POC. For example, Kevin Kutchinski presented a session originally titled “How global free trade will cure poverty.” Apparently he realised the problems with this and changed it to a slightly less offensive title that I’ve since forgotten.

Embedded racism aside (for now), Edmonton has also been facing some gender issues in some circles, including the activist community, and, as was demonstrated to me yesterday, the online community*. At IDEAfest, I presented “Putting an End to Rape Culture: Challenging Attitudes and Misinformation.” I didn’t expect to get much of an audience (only about 100 people dropped by throughout the day), but I did end up getting between twenty to thirty people, which was an average turnout.

The problem, then? Only four men showed up.

Let me repeat: There were only four men who showed up because they gave at least a bit of a damn about strategies to end the sexual violation of women, at an event dominated by men–over 20 presenters were men and less than 10 were women. The attendees were somewhat more balanced, from what I saw.

I want to make it clear that I’m not phased by the size of my audience, but the gender imbalance. When men don’t pay attention to or ignore information on what they can do to help end rape, especially when it’s practically handed to them, they reinforce the idea that’s it’s up to women to stop rape. Additionally, and perhaps more importantly, it demonstrates that the majority of men just don’t care.

I fully recognise there were two other interesting sessions being put on (both by two of the under ten women presenters), so I don’t feel entirely comfortable blaming individual people for not showing up, but it is interesting when presentations on the history of clothing or the importance of arts for children take precedence over ideas on how men can end the violation of their mothers, sisters, daughters, and partners (if they showed up to any of the sessions at all).

So although I can’t blame all individual men who didn’t show up to the session, I do believe that every man there had a responsibility to the women in their lives to attend. The number of men who showed up is a clear example of embedded sexism within the men at IDEAfest. Rape doesn’t affect men (to the same extent), so no need to show up, right?

So what are the solutions? For the embedded racism of the event, it’s a simple matter of talking to more POC. Why weren’t more POC invited to speak? Why not have POC talking about the issues that affect them, rather than getting whites to? These are pretty easy first steps. As for the gender representation, again, the first step is ensuring an equal number of men and women speak. Finally, regarding the rape issue, I think we all need to hold the men in our lives accountable as a first step. I hope this post causes some of the men to think about why they couldn’t spare a half hour to learn how they can end the rape of women.

To reiterate, I’m not saying my presentation was the best one to choose from, or that I chose the greatest topic, or that I executed it perfectly. What I’m saying is that all men have a responsibility to end gendered violence, and when gendered violence is a result of so many things, from sexism in general to gender roles, all men (and certainly all men who are unaware), encourage the rape of women to some extent, whether they commit the act or not. The fact that most of the men in attendance were “decent men” does nothing to discount the fact that their gender politics are fucked.

*The event was largely promoted through Facebook and Twitter, so many of the attendees can, I think, be classified as being part of the active online community in Edmonton.


Underground Media and the Importance of do-it-yourself local media.

March 7, 2009

By Samantha Power and Aaron Chubb.

Click Here


SUBvision and student filmmaking

March 7, 2009

Hey all, I’m liveblogging from the U of A IDEAfest today!

Click Here


Twitter and Social Media

March 7, 2009

Spoken Word, Race, and Intimate Violence

February 4, 2009

I’d be writing more, but the AirPort on my MacBook is thoroughly fucked, and I get Internet access only intermittently. This isn’t going to be a post about one specific thing, rather, since I haven’t been writing much lately, it’s going to be a great mix of thoughts and goings-on. With that said, here we go…

I had my first spoken word performance Thursday night (29 January). I wrote the piece in about an hour and rehearsed it once before going. I think it was received generally well; I definitely felt like the black sheep in the crowd. I shared it at the University of Alberta Sexual Assault Centre’s Night of Expression, and there was a lot of art and poetry shared about sexual assault. My piece was angry and humourous, while there were a couple darkly ironic pieces (I felt), and a lot of really morbid ones. Not that there’s anything wrong with that by any means. I think humour has a role in healing and dealing with serious issues like sexual violence, though, as long as it’s used properly. In case I need to make it clear for some folks, making jokes about sexual assault is not funny or helpful. Using humour to criticise the media and police when they tell women to lock their doors and windows to prevent rape, was, I think, funny and constructive. Of course, I’m open to criticism.

I’ve become really critical of white feminists (and white “liberals”) lately. Since last semester, my anti-racist politics have really developed, and these politics have, among other things, led me to write a paper on gendered violence against Indigenous women and present it in Albany, NY. Since really looking at race and my own relations to it, I’ve learned to recognise so much of the racism that goes on in a lot of feminist circles, and there’s a lot of it. I recently brought up some concerns I had with the U of A Women’s Centre regarding the fact that nearly all of its’ members are white university students. There is absolutely no excuse for that. Ignoring issues that concern Women of Colour and People of Colour and focusing on issues that only affect white people or focusing on issues from a white perspective only is racist.

So yeah, I’m noticing things that are so goddam obvious now and should have been before, too. Like how most of the students in Women’s Studies are white. Or how no one objected yesterday to a sentence in a text comparing white women’s situation in the 1700s(?) to Black slaves. Or how people get all nervous and try to change the subject when you tell them they’re not focusing enough on race when they should be*. And yeah, it’s a subject that gets me pissed off, because I’ve dealt with it my whole life when I wished every day for my skin to be whiter so I could pass as a white person, when I told by my grade six teacher I was a waste of space, when I was called a dirty Indian. And you know what? I think all PoC have a right to be pissed off when they get fed the same bullshit day after day.

On another note, if you’re in the Edmonton community, you should come to Freeskool this Sunday (8 February) at the Pride Centre (9540 111 Ave). The subject is going to be intimate violence, and how to be a good ally. I’ll be speaking really briefly, probably not about much but what people can do to get involved in fighting violence against women. If you’re interested in being part of the organising committee, come at 10:00. If not, the day starts at 11:00. I hope to see some Edmontonians there!

Anyway, these are some of the thoughts around my head. Once again, if anyone has any pointers for MacBooks with AirPort problems, it would be greatly appreciated, and then hopefully I can get to posting more often.

*I realise there are other groups of women who get ignored and are marginalised by privileged feminists, like fat women, (dis)abled women, trans women, sex workers… I could go on for some time. None of these women should be ignored, but I feel I can only focus in-depth on one dynamic at a time, and when I feel I’ve sufficiently learned it, I move on to another. It’s not ideal, I know, but it’s the best I can do.


I’m Back… Again

January 23, 2009

So, I’ve decided to poke my head in the door once again and see who’s still around. It appears that a few of you are still checking the blog, which is encouraging. At any rate, I’ve been gone for some time now, but the break was very much needed. I’ve begun pursuing some new things and have thought a lot about blogging.

First, the blog, since that’s why you’re here. I’ve decided to keep Doing Feminism as my primary blog. It only makes sense, since I love writing here. The confusion before about a new blog was simply out of a desire to try new forms of writing, writing that I’m (thankfully) pursuing offline. It was getting to a point where so much of my work was done online that I think I needed to put things into perspective and unplug a bit. So, the short story is that I’ll be blogging here, and with things more in perspective now, I hope the writing will be better. At least, it will keep getting better, as it did before, I think. (Gawd, it’s embarrassing to look at things I was writing only half a year ago.)

Now, as I stated, I’m pursuing some other forms of writing. Namely, I’m doing some work in creative non-fiction, but I’ve recently begun to dabble in spoken word. Depending on how this piece I’m working on works out, I may or may not be performing my first spoken word piece this coming Thursday. Time will tell. I’ve also begun a small writing group with some friends, and we’re exchanging and discussing our writing on a bi-weekly basis. It’s a blast, and something I definitely need.

I’ve got other news here and there about recent goings-on, but I won’t post about them just yet. Stay tuned for excerpts from my offline work I’m doing; I’m sure I’ll post some from time to time. Anyway, I’m back, and, once again, it feels great.

Also of note, something is effed up with AirPort in my MacBook and I have very limited Internet access with it as a result. If anyone has any pointers on this, please post them in the comments or email me. Thanks!


I’ve Moved

December 30, 2008

Well, not so much moved as spread myself around. I’ve got another blog up and running now, but rest assured, I haven’t abandoned Doing Feminism. While the more I think about it, the more it makes sense to just take my feminism there, too, but we’ll see what happens.

In the meantime, if you like what I write, please follow me there and/or add the blog to your RSS feeder. As I said, my intention isn’t to abandon this site, but I’m also unsure of whether or not I have the resources to run two sites effectively. Time will tell.

If you’re looking for a reason as to why I moved, I suppose I feel this space didn’t allow me to express myself as much as I wanted. I could always change that, but those weren’t my intentions when I started the site, and the name isn’t suitable, an so on. All in all, I simply couldn’t express myself the way I wanted to. Anyway, I hope the offers a bit of an explanation for those of you who were looking for one. I hope you stick around!

Best,
Derek


Happy Holidays (High School Edition)

December 24, 2008

I’m taking a short break from my hibernation this season to wish you all some happy holidays, and a merry Christmas to those of you who celebrate it. I hope this time of year is a safe one for you and your loved ones, and that you’re able to do with it as you please. Tonight, I’m playing Yahtzee with my family, busting out Sufjan Stevens, and watching the first two Home Alone movies. On that note, though, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, readers!

Here’s a photo from my high school days (wherein I look like a douchebag):

Note the bad Christmas tie.

Note the bad Christmas tie.


Into the Void

December 1, 2008

Just a heads up that I have once again disappeared into the void of academia. I have two papers due in the next two days, and I am flying to Albany for the Race Matters to Feminism conference at the State University of New York. I’m presenting Friday, but will be there Thursday, too, so if you’re in the area, feel free to stop by! Saturday, I’ll be taking a train to New York City and just taking in the sights.

While I’m at it, does anyone know any good vegan/vegetarian restaurants in NYC? Sights that I absolutely must see? I plan to check out Times Square, of course, along with the Empire State Building, and a bit of Central Park. I leave Monday afternoon, so I don’t have a lot of time, but it should be enough to get enough out of the trip to satisfy me.

Anyway, don’t expect any decent posts from me at least until mid-way though December. I wish I could blog more, but I simply haven’t the time. Perhaps I’ll post entries from my hotel in Albany or the hostel in NYC. Time will tell!


White Ribbon Days highlight abuses

November 26, 2008

Here’s my piece I wrote for yesterday’s Gateway. I ran into some problems with this one, namely that “Women of Colour” was changed to “ethnic females” in the published version. The Gateway has since apologised and said they’ll rectify the problem. The online version is here, where the issues are still there. I’ve corrected them here.

Today marks the beginning of the White Ribbon Days, which extend from 25 November, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, until 6 December, the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women. These two weeks are significant because for this short time, people are reminded of the aggression women face on a daily basis.

Here in Canada, according to the largest survey conducted on the topic, one in four women have experienced some form of physical or sexual violence. It’s hard to believe that, given the prevalence of this important issue, there isn’t more public discussion on it. Needless to say, the subject is tabooed, which factors into the lack of attention given to this problem. But another main factor is that these abuses are largely conceptualized as an isolated issue, rather than a social problem.

On 6 December, 1989, Marc Lepine entered Montreal’s École Polytechnique and murdered 14 women, screaming, “I hate feminists.” The murders, which came to be known as the Montreal Massacre, sparked a movement against hostility towards women, but there were still many Canadians who were left convinced that Marc Lepine was simply a man gone astray and didn’t believe this was a social problem.

It’s both this kind of belief and the failure to provide public discourse on violence against women as a larger social issue that contribute to a collective forgetfulness of the problem. Women face harm and go ignored on a broad, national level.

There are efforts that attempt to counter this, among which is the White Ribbon Campaign (WRC). Begun in 1991 by a handful of men, the WRC is a large, public effort to educate men about what they can do to stop violence against women. During White Ribbon Days, men are asked to wear a white ribbon, pledging that they will never commit, condone, or remain silent about such abuses.

Wearing a white ribbon is a public reminder of the prevalence of these brutalities, and various events occurring throughout White Ribbon Days’ two weeks seek to further increase the level of discourse around this issue, countering the active forgetting of western society—for a short time.

While the WRC operates yearlong, much like other efforts (such as Take Back the Night), the emphasis is placed on a particular time of year—in this case, the next two weeks. Women face violence daily across Canada, so a two-week long effort to remind the public about the plight women face isn’t enough.

Problems with the lack of attention focused on violence against women throughout the year aside, efforts to end it are particularly problematic in that many of them utilize a colour-blind approach. Women of colour face a disproportionate amount of abuse, and in Canada, Aboriginal women are severely affected. Studies on the prevalence of violence against women belonging to visible minorities are severely lacking, but according to the Stolen Sisters, one study showed that Aboriginal women with status between the ages of 25–44 were five times more likely than other women of their age group to die as a result of violence.

To adequately address abuse towards women, we must also recognize that it’s racialized. While it’s important not to discount the experiences of women who are affected by domestic violence, a focus solely on violence in the home further marginalizes women of colour, who often experience brutality in other racialized spaces.

Efforts such as White Ribbon Days are needed, but a constant effort of remembering women and the violence they face is crucial to challenge our society’s active forgetting. A notable attempt to account for the experiences of minorities must also be pursued in these efforts, because ignoring them any more only further pushes the idea that aggression against women is just a white woman’s problem.